Every once in a while, an ‘expert’ will expound their belief in various news media that Pakistan’s debt, especially domestic debt, should be restructured. What’s the key evidence or theory backing their arguments? Nominal figures stating the government could save an X billion amount of dollars in debt servicing.
These flimsy arguments are comical, to say
the least. Another frequently cited statistic is that each 100-bps cut in
interest rates saves the Pakistani government an
estimated Rs 250bn. The interpretation of
these figures totally misses the mark and primarily suffer from money illusion.
Debt and its servicing costs cannot and should not be seen in nominal terms,
alone.
Firstly, debt only has to be restructured when the borrower is unable to fulfil its financial obligations. When a borrower faces difficulty in making debt payments, creditors give concessions entailing a change in the payment terms (reduction in interest rate or extension of maturity) or a write-down (partial waive off) on the principal. This is done to avoid a costly bankruptcy case in the event of a default.
When it comes to
domestic debt, the government is not close to this scenario at all as the SBP
provides adequate liquidity to meet the government’s borrowing needs. Moreover,
commercial banks are happy to continue funding government borrowing.
The need for domestic debt restructuring
only arises if banks (or other financial institutions) decide not to fund
government borrowing which could only happen due to a crisis of confidence.
Historically, there has never been domestic debt restructuring which is why
that crisis of confidence has not arrived.
However, hypothetically, if the government
were to restructure domestic debt today, a crisis of confidence could arise in
a future high debt-to-GDP ratio scenario. Which is why talks of domestic debt
restructuring must not be taken lightly.
But what about the factor that really
matters? Debt dynamics of domestic and external debt work differently for
several reasons.
The above equation shows the domestic debt
dynamics. The change in domestic debt-to-GDP ratio depends on a few key
variables – real interest rate, growth rate, and primary balance. If r > g,
debt-to-GDP escalates. Meanwhile, if the primary balance is negative (i.e. a
primary deficit), then the debt-to-GDP worsens too.
Historically, real interest rates have averaged
out around 0.1%-2.7% (depending on the choice of time period), while long-run
growth rate of the economy has been 4.7%. So, in Pakistan, g > r by far
which is positive for domestic debt dynamics. Implicit in this is the fact that
the government has deflated its domestic debt over time – r has been low due to
high inflation and central bank non-independence. Meanwhile, primary balance
has been -0.5% of GDP since 1992 – which is not a good thing (IMF).
However, when you run these figures
together in the equation, the total impact on domestic debt-to-GDP ratio has
been negative – meaning domestic debt is sustainable or falling (in real terms).
Among this, there is an assumption that
government revenues grow at the rate of nominal growth rate of the economy.
Even that assumption mostly holds as nominal growth rate has been 13% while tax
revenues have grown 12% over the past
decade, for instance.
When it comes to external debt, the
situation becomes murkier. To pay off external debt, the government does not
only require tax revenue but adequate foreign reserves. Moreover, exchange rate
shocks can escalate external debt payments (in local currency terms).
In the above equation which shows external debt dynamics, pcb stands for
primary current account balance, while △res stands
for change in reserves. In Pakistan’s case, interest rate on foreign debt r* has
been 3.6% historically – much higher than that on domestic debt.
Furthermore, the particularly troubling part is that this is only brought down
due to concessional multi or bilateral lending.
The interest rate on commercial borrowing
and bonds are usually 5% or above even in supposedly good times. Moving on,
primary current account balance has been -1.9% of GDP since 1980. Even if you
take out the effect of change in reserves (which is likely negative), the impact
on external debt-to-GDP turns out to be positive – meaning external debt is
rising in real terms or unsustainable.
This is some simple arithmetic which tell
the true story of Pakistan’s debt dynamics. This is why when the Pakistani
government restructured its debt in the 1970s and early 2000s, only external
debt was restructured and not domestic debt. The math and some history speak
for itself.
No comments:
Post a Comment